#The Papers
Six papers, one argument. Each is self-contained; together they build a complete account of why externalized, organized reasoning scales and how to govern it.
┌─────────────┐
│ Paper 0 │
│ Ontology │ "What exists: belongs-to"
│ (FOIS) │
└──────┬──────┘
│ defines the index
┌────────────┼────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌────────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ Paper 7 │ │ Paper 1 │ │ Paper R │
│ Turing │ │ Library │ │ Redaction│
│ (ICML/ │ │ Theorem │ │ (NeurIPS)│
│ ICLR) │ │ (NeurIPS)│ │ │
└─────┬──────┘ └─────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘
│ │ │
│ capability │ efficiency │ reflexive
│ │ │
└──────────┬───┘ │
▼ │
┌──────────────┐ │
│ Paper 3 │◄─────────┘
│ Hippocampus │
│ (TiCS/Nat │ "The brain does this too"
│ Neuro) │
└──────┬───────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────┐
│ Paper 4+6 │
│ Governance │ "Who decides"
│ (FAccT/Law │
│ journal) │
└──────────────┘
#Summary Table
| # | Title | Core claim | Venue | Proofs | Draft | Blog |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Belongs-To and Nothing Else | Single-primitive ontology | Applied Ontology / FOIS | ✅ 5 modules | v2 | — |
| 1 | The Library Theorem | Indexed retrieval exp. faster | NeurIPS 2026 | ✅ 4 modules | LaTeX v6 | — |
| 7 | External Memory, Not Chain of Thought | Fixed window = FA; + store = TM | ICML / ICLR 2027 | ✅ Turing.lean | v1 | v1 |
| R | Redaction | Extract knowledge from weights | NeurIPS 2026 | — | Plan only | — |
| 3 | Your Hippocampus Is a Library | Brain implements Library Theorem | Trends Cog Sci / Nat Neuro | — | — | — |
| 4+6 | Who Writes the Constitution? | Policy-governed AI + democratic input | FAccT / Law journal | — | 4a: detailed plan | — |
#Dependency Order
Paper 0 (ontology) — no dependencies, submit anytime
Paper 1 (library theorem) — no dependencies, arxiv-ready NOW
Paper 7 (turing) — cites Paper 1, self-contained
Paper R (redaction) — cites Papers 0 + 1, needs experiment
Paper 3 (hippocampus) — cites Papers 1 + 7, needs lit review
Paper 4+6 (governance) — cites Paper 7, needs Teachout
#Blog Series
Each paper gets a blog post. Anthropic style: clear, first-person, no jargon, one big idea per post. These are the shareable versions — what you send friends, collaborators, potential co-authors.
| Blog | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| "Your LLM Is a Finite Automaton" (Paper 7) | v1 done | Ship first — sharpest claim |
| "Why Organization Beats Scale" (Paper 1) | — | Second — supports Paper 7 |
| "One Relation Is Enough" (Paper 0) | — | When draft v3 ready |
| "What If You Could Read a Model's Mind?" (Paper R) | — | After experiment |
| "Your Hippocampus Is a Library" (Paper 3) | — | After lit review |
| "Who Writes the Constitution?" (Paper 4+6) | — | After Teachout conversation |
#Website
Blog posts publish to haak.world. Each post links to:
- The paper (PDF or arxiv)
- The Lean proofs (GitHub repo or inline)
- The other posts in the series
Navigation: landing page with the dependency diagram above, linking to each post. Clean, minimal, readable.
#Immediate Next Steps
- Submit Paper 1 to arxiv — it's ready, don't let new results delay it
- Publish "Your LLM Is a Finite Automaton" blog — on haak.world
- Send blog to Zephyr Teachout — opens the governance conversation
- Draft Paper 7 for ICLR 2027 — May deadline, plenty of time
- Paper 0 to Applied Ontology — independent track, submit when polished
- Paper R experiment — run on GCloud, validate the construction
#Lean Proof Library — Current State
11 modules, 35 theorems, 0 sorries.
| Module | Paper | Theorems |
|---|---|---|
| Library/Basic | 1 | Config, branching factor, capacity bound |
| Library/Sequential | 1 | Ω(N) lower bound (pigeonhole) |
| Library/Indexed | 1 | O(log_b N) upper bound (B-tree) |
| Library/Separation | 1 | Exponential separation ratio |
| Library/Reasoning | 1, 7 | T² vs T·log T, unbounded gap |
| Library/Turing | 7 | Bounded cycling, externalization completeness |
| Ontology/Basic | 0 | Entity, belonging, co-participation |
| Ontology/MetaQualities | 0 | 5 meta-qualities, completeness |
| Ontology/Closure | 0 | Reflexive closure terminates at depth 1 |
| Ontology/Derived | 0 | Situation graph: symmetric, grounded, monotone |
| Ontology/Expressiveness | 0 | 12 BFO/DOLCE reductions, distinctness |
strategy · 2026-03-16 · zach + claude
Strategy 26 — Paper Arc 2026 — Map and Plan — 2026 — Zachary F. Mainen / HAAK